Selected Paradise Posts and FeedsAll the precious Metals Investing information that you could ever hope for.

show_all_posts


Today’s Free Forecast: What IBM Could Tell Us + 200-Point Rebound Looked Gutless

Today's Free Forecast: What IBM Could Tell Us + 200-Point Rebound Looked Gutless
Today's updates from Rick's Picks. You are receiving this email because you signed up for daily updates at www.rickackerman.com

The Hidden Pivot Seminar

"Trading success is only six hours away."

Learn Rick Ackerman's risk-averse Hidden Pivot Method and never trade the old way again.

The seminar comes with a 100% money-back guarantee. 

...I am pinching myself to be sure I am not dreaming. I am more confident every day with the HP approach. I am making money... I am able to escape the screen if I so wish. I do not end the day stressed and hyperactive. Impressed? I am absolutely knocked out - just wish I had found the site years ago. Best wishes, long may you continue.- David Ivory


Recent Commentary


Actionable Advice for Friday, May 24

IBM – IBM Corp. (Last:206.16)

May 24, 2013 7:41 am GMT

If IBM heads south over the next week, the 196.54 midpoint pivot shown could prove to be not only a good place for us to bottom-fish aggressively, but to gauge whether the bull-market high at 215.90 record in mid-March is likely to be an important one.  There is much to like about the corrective pattern, and that is why we should trust price action at ‘p’ to tell us something of value.


****

200-Point Dow Rebound Looked Gutless

by Rick Ackerman on May 24, 2013 7:06 am GMT · 0 comments[edit]

Yesterday’s rally recouped a 200-point overnight selloff in the Dow, but because it was unpersuasive from a technical standpoint, we expect the week to end on a whimper at best. At worst, the selling could carry into next week, and if it persist so that shares fall on a Tuesday – something that has not occurred in more than four months – then we would view that as further evidence that Wednesday’s high was an important one.  Regarding “weak technicals,” notice in the chart below how buyers of DJIA index futures failed to surpass even a single important peak on the hourly chart after devoting an entire night and day to the task. From our perspective this is telling, since, according to our Hidden Pivot Method of analysis, rallies destined for greatness, or even just goodness, must exceed a new peak on the hourly chart with each new thrust.  Not this time, though, and that’s why we would classify yesterday’s rebound – all 200 points of it – as a bust.

Wednesday night, index futures had gotten pounded into a deep hole after bulls got trapped celebrating Bernanke’s latest appearance on Capitol Hill. The man had said absolutely nothing of importance, as usual, and although that has rarely troubled investors in the past, this time it evidently did. The result was that U.S. markets appeared to be in avalanche mode in the wee hours, gaining momentum following the previous day’s bull-trap reversal. Although, as we have noted above, yesterday’s ascent from the depths was not impressive by itself, the ability of DaBoyz to arrest a slide that should have carried strongly into the opening was a pretty good trick. We doubt the Plunge Protection Team was involved, although it would have been a cheap trick for them to turn the tide at 3 a.m., when stocks finally got traction, with some judicious buying of S&P futures or perhaps mini contracts.

Time to Straddle

From a trading standpoint, Rick’s Picks has recommended that subscribers straddle the fence.  Although our target for the Dow Industrials is 1500 points higher, Wednesday’s highs coincided with some middling rally targets that had the potential to end the party, at least for a while. Subscribers reported buying – as instructed – Johnson & Johnson May 87.50 weekly puts for 0.11 that traded as high as 0.60 yesterday; and DIA  June 152 puts for 1.00 that hit 2.32.   Click here if you’ve never made a profitable options trade and would like to change your luck.


****

Next Hidden Pivot Seminar: June 5-6
Signup before 6/1 and save $50. Use coupon code 7D5629

 

Copyright © 2013 Hidden Pivot Enterprises, All rights reserved.



U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Bernanke addressed the Joint Economic Committee of bernankethe U.S. Congress on The Economic Outlook [saying in a nutshell] “We clearly understand the game we are playing, but we are boxed in and have to stay with our current strategy.  We hope for the best because we are out of options”.

So writes Ian R. Campbell in his Economic Straight Talk Newsletter which is available by subscription only . The commentary* below is just one item discussed in his latest daily newsletter* (see archived newsletters in their entirety here) under the heading Europe:  Picture quiz

(NOTE: This post is presented by  Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com and www.munKNEE.com and the free Intelligence Report newsletter (see sample here – register here). The article may have been edited ([ ]), abridged (…) and/or reformatted (some sub-titles and bold/italics emphases) for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read.

Campbell goes on to say in further edited excerpts:

Bernanke spoke about:

  • the Federal Reserve being “aware that a long period of low interest rates has costs and risks”, which costs he identified as the low income returns ‘savers’ currently are generating from “savings accounts and government bonds”;
  • the risk (which Mr. Bernanke described as a “cost”), which he specifically said is “one that we take very seriously”, that if very low interest rates persist for “too long” (which he didn’t define) that “could undermine financial stability”, where “for example, investors or portfolio managers dissatisfied with low returns may ‘reach for yield’ by taking on more credit risk, duration risk, or leverage”;
  • “recognizing the drawbacks of persistently low (interest) rates, the Federal Reserve’s ‘Open Market Committee’ “actively seeks economic conditions consistent with sustainably higher interest rates”;
  • however, ‘unfortunately’ if the Federal Reserve were now to withdrew its current monetary (quantitative) easing policies while interest rates might “rise temporarily”, that “would also carry a substantial risk of slowing or ending the economic recovery and causing inflation to fall further” (i.e. read ‘lead to recession or depression’; and,
  • the “best way to achieve higher returns in the medium term (undefined) and beyond is for the Federal Reserve – consistent with its congressional mandate – to provide policy accommodation as needed to foster maximum (U.S.) employment and price stability”.
[From the above it would appear that Bernanke is saying in a nutshell] “we clearly understand the game we are playing, but we are boxed in and have to stay with our current strategy.  We hope for the best because we are out of options”.

Other things in Mr. Bernanke’s address I found of interest are:

  • his statements on the U.S. unemployment rate, in particular his reference to a continued ‘weak job market’ and his specific reference to “nearly 8 million (Americans who) are working part-time when they would prefer full-time work.  All too often jobs are reported in the U.S. and other countries as if ‘a job’ is ‘a job’ is ‘a job’, without reference to job quality or pay scale;
  • his statement that “since last summer, financial conditions in the euro area have improved somewhat”.  I am unsure of his basis for that conclusion, as he didn’t explain his reasoning.  From my perspective, given what has developed since last summer in France, Italy, Portugal, and Spain – and throw in Cyprus, Slovenia, and ongoing recession in the eurozone – Mr. Bernanke’s statement doesn’t make sense to me; and,
  • his statement with respect to U.S. 2013 prospective GDP growth, specifically in the contexts of (among other things) the recent ending of the payroll tax cut, tax increases, and the so-called sequester.  Collectively, Mr. Bernanke said these things are expected to reduce 2013 GDP growth by 1.5% from what it otherwise might be.  I think importantly, Mr. Bernanke then said: “in present circumstances, with short-term interest rates already close to zero, monetary policy does not have the capacity to fully offset an economic headwind of this magnitude”.

With respect to the last point, you may recall that I commented on the ‘coming in force’ of the ‘sequester’ on March 2 which cut U.S. federal government spending by $85 billion per year – see U.S.: Sequester and negative economics.  In that commentary I said:

“To be clear, the point I was (and am) making is:

  • in the overall scheme of America’s national debt and deficits, $85 billion per year is rather immaterial;
  • if one accepts $85 billion to be immaterial in a U.S. federal accounts context, the forecasted impact of the sequester cuts in a the next seven months on GDP (0.5% decline) is material, and lost jobs (400,000 – 750,000) are significant; and,
  • consider the negative impact on America’s economy if this year’s U.S. pre-sequester federal budgeted spend of $3.8 trillion was cut by $300 billion instead of by only $85 billion.  Query:  How much more would the negative leverage on U.S. economic performance then be, and would a $300 billion U.S. federal spending reduction result in an exponential negative economic impact?

Interestingly, I have seen no report or comment on what the resultant U.S. federal deficit is expected to be for fiscal 2013 following sequester cuts.  If U.S. GDP indeed drops by 0.5% as a result of the sequester cuts, I would expect U.S. federal government revenues to fall from pre-sequester forecasts.  If that is right, and I think it has to be, then what was forecast to be a $900 billion 2013 U.S. federal deficit will be more than the result derived by deducting the $85 billion in sequester cuts from the previously forecast $900 billion 2013 federal deficit ($815 billion).”

Mr. Bernanke’s comment yesterday reminded me of what I had pointed out on March 2…I believe this is something that economists and commentators ought to actively research, and that those who invest in the financial markets ought to think hard about.

We live in interesting, and I think troublesome, times.

(Editor’s Note: The author’s views and conclusions in the above article are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original post. Furthermore, the views, conclusions and any recommendations offered in this article are not to be construed as an endorsement of such by the editor.)

*The Economic Straight Talk Newsletter (Insights for Serious Traders and Investors - Today’s Commentary on Economic & Resource News) by Ian R. Campbell, FCA, FCBV; © 2013, Stock Research DD Inc., all rights reserved.

Other “Economic Straight Talk” Commentaries:

1. Can Bank Deposit Confiscation Happen Here?

27106

The following is a ‘to be forewarned is to be forearmed’ commentary. Should those with bank deposits in the…European Union be concerned about the possibility of a ‘Cyprus event’ coming ‘soon to their neighbourhood’?…What about bank deposit confiscation in Canada?…[T]his is something to…consider and ‘think about’. Read More »

2. Will We See Real Economic Growth or a Real Decline in World Stock Markets? That is the Trillion Dollar Question

Without economic growth, and real economic growth at that, there can be no meaningful long-term economic recovery in the developed countries.  Growth or lack thereof will have to be reflected in the financial markets over time.  Currently, I continue to see a disconnect between where the financial markets are pricing things, and where I think they ought to be pricing things. Words: 784

3. “Ponzi Finance”: What Must Happen To Bring It To An End?

GLD Update…From a Secret Bunker in Arkansas

This content is for Yearly Subscription, Monthly and Free 5 Day Trial members only. Visit the site and log in/register to read.


This content is for Yearly Subscription, Monthly and Free 5 Day Trial members only. Visit the site and log in/register to read.


In The News Today

Socialism is not in the least what it pretends to be. It is not the pioneer of a better and finer world, but the spoiler of what thousands of years of civilization have created. It does not build, it destroys. For destruction is the essence of it. It produces nothing, it only consumes what the... Read more »

The post In The News Today appeared first on Jim Sinclair's Mineset.



Are we headed for rampant inflation or crippling deflation? I believe that we will seeInflation_Deflation2 both.  The next major financial panic will cause a substantial deflationary wave first, and after that we will see unprecedented inflation as the central bankers and our politicians respond to the financial crisis. [Let me explain why I think that will unfold.] Words: 1025  Charts: 3

So writes Michael (http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com) in edited excerpts from his original article* entitled Will It Be Inflation Or Deflation? The Answer May Surprise You.

 The following article is presented by  Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com and www.munKNEE.com  and the FREE Market Intelligence Report newsletter (sample hereregister here) and may have been edited ([ ]), abridged (…) and/or reformatted (some sub-titles and bold/italics emphases) for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. This paragraph must be included in any article re-posting to avoid copyright infringement.

Michael goes on to say in further edited excerpts:

This is a subject that is hotly debated by economists all over the country.

  • Some insist that the wild money printing that the Federal Reserve is doing combined with out of control government spending will eventually result in hyperinflation.
  • Others point to all of the deflationary factors in our economy and argue that we will experience tremendous deflation when the bubble economy that we are currently living in bursts.

So what is the truth?  Well, for the reasons listed below, I believe that we will see both.  The next major financial panic will cause a substantial deflationary wave first, and after that we will see unprecedented inflation as the central bankers and our politicians respond to the financial crisis.  This will happen so quickly that many will get “financial whiplash” as they try to figure out what to do with their money.  We are moving toward a time of extreme financial instability, and different strategies will be called for at different times.

Why We Will See Deflation First 

The following are some of the major deflationary forces that are affecting our economy right now:

1. The Velocity Of Money

The rate at which money circulates in our economy is the lowest that it has been in more than 50 years.  It has been steadily falling since the late 1990s, and this is a clear sign that economic activity is slowing down.  The shaded areas in the chart [below] represent recessions, and as you can see, the velocity of money always slows down during a recession…Even though the government is telling us that we are not in a recession right now, the velocity of money continues to drop like a rock.  This is one of the factors that is putting a tremendous amount of deflationary pressure on our economy.

Velocity Of Money

2. The Trade Deficit

[Every]…single month, far more money leaves this country than comes into it.  In fact, the amount going out exceeds the amount coming in by about half a trillion dollars each year.  This is extremely deflationary.  Our system is constantly bleeding cash, and this is one of the reasons why the federal government has felt a need to run such huge budget deficits and why the Federal Reserve has felt a need to print so much money.  They are trying to pump money back into a system that is constantly bleeding massive amounts of cash…

The trade deficit is one of our biggest economic problems, and yet most Americans do not even understand what it is.  As you can see below, our trade deficit really started getting bad in the late 1990s.

Trade Deficit

3. Wages And Salaries As A Percentage Of GDP

One of the primary drivers of inflation is consumer spending but consumers cannot spend money if they do not have it and, right now, wages and salaries as a percentage of GDP are near a record low [as can be seen in the chart below].  This is a very deflationary state of affairs.  The percentage of low paying jobs in the U.S. economy continues to increase, and we have witnessed an explosion in the ranks of the “working poor” in recent years.  For consumer prices to rise significantly, more money is going to have to get into the hands of average American consumers first…

Wages And Salaries As A Percentage Of GDP

 

4. A Bursting Debt Bubble

Right now, we are living in the greatest debt bubble in the history of the world.  When a debt bubble bursts, fear and panic typically cause the flow of money and the flow of credit to really tighten up.  We saw that happen at the beginning of the Great Depression of the 1930s, we saw that happen back in 2008, and we will see it happen again.  Deleveraging is deflationary by nature, and it can cause economic activity to grind to a standstill very rapidly.

FREE Market Intelligence Report newsletter (sample hereregister here)

The Next Wave of the Economic Collapse – Deflation

During the next major wave of the economic collapse, there will be times when it will seem like hardly anyone has any money.

  • The “easy credit” of the past will be long gone, and large numbers of individuals and small businesses will find it very difficult to get loans.
  • Cash will be king – at least for a short period of time.  Those that do not have any savings at all will really be hurting.

Some of the financial elite seem to be positioning themselves for what is coming.  For example, even though he has been making public statements about how great stocks are right now, the truth is that Warren Buffett is currently sitting on $49 billion in cash.  That is the most that he has ever had sitting in cash. Does he know something?

The Wave After That – Inflation

Of course there will be a tremendous amount of pressure on the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve to do something once a financial crash happens.  The response by the federal government and the Federal Reserve will likely be extremely inflationary as they try to resuscitate the system.  It will probably be far more dramatic than anything we have seen so far. Cash will not be king for long.  In fact, eventually cash will be trash.

Conclusion

The actions of the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve in response to the coming financial crisis will greatly upset much of the rest of the world and cause the death of the U.S. dollar – and that is why gold, silver and other hard assets are going to be so good to have in the long-term.  In the short-term they will experience wild swings in price, but if you can handle the ride you will be smiling in the end.

In the coming years, we are going to experience both inflation and deflation, and neither one will be pleasant at all. Get prepared while you still can, because time is running out.

(Editor’s Note: The author’s views and conclusions in the above article are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original post. Furthermore, the views, conclusions and any recommendations offered in this article are not to be construed as an endorsement of such by the editor.)

*http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/will-it-be-inflation-or-delfation-the-answer-may-surprise-you (Copyright © 2013 The Economic Collapse)

Related Articles:

1. Hyperinflation: 21 Countries Have Experienced It In Last 25 Years – Is the U.S. Next!

[Hyperinflation is not an unusual phenomenon. 32 countries have experienced hyperinflation over the last 100 years of which no less than 21 have experienced it in the past 25 years and 4 in the past 10 years. The United States is one of the few countries to have experienced two currency collapses during its history (1812-1814 and 1861-1865). Is it about to happen again?] Words: 1450 Read More »

2.  These 5 Events Will Lead to Higher Gold & Silver Prices

It is my contention that the move in precious metals…[from] late 2008 through 2011 was largely a result of the expansion in central bank balance sheets and the perceived threat of runaway inflation. Since 2011, [however,] we’ve seen economic growth improve and inflation rates across the globe subside. As a result, investment banks and market strategists are arguing against owning gold, and making the case that, with a lack of inflation and an improved economy, the need for owning gold as an insurance hedge against inflation and currency debasement is no longer present. I strongly disagree. Read More »3. James Turk Interviews Robert Prechter: Which Will It Be – Hyperinflation or Massive Deflation?James Turk believes hyperinflation is ahead. Bob Prechter believes massive deflation is coming. An interesting discussion between the two takes place in this audio. Ultimately, both lead to Depression. Only the route taken differs, but that is important.

4. A Hypothetical Look At What Could Possibly Be In Store for the U.S.

The economic condition of the country continues to decline toward its rendezvous with an, as yet, unknowable catastrophe. As economic and political matters become more desperate, so will what the government considers acceptable. If a debt default cannot be engineered via continuous inflation, it will occur via a direct repudiation of obligations or a quasi-surreptitious one like the hypothetical one presented in this article…a look (not a prediction) at a series of not improbable events that could develop [and which] would change our economic world overnight. Viewed from this perspective, I don’t think such a move or something approximating it is out of the question. Words: 1300 Read More »

The post We’re Headed for Crippling Deflation First & Then Rampant Inflation – Here’s Why appeared first on Munknee.com.



The Biggest Loser Wins

By: 
Peter Schiff
Thursday, May 23, 2013

While the world's economies jockey one another for the lead in the currency devaluation derby, it's worth considering the value of the prize they are seeking. They believe a weak currency opens the door to trade dominance, by allowing manufacturers to undercut foreign rivals, and to economic growth, by fighting deflation. On the other side of the coin, they believe a strong currency is an economic albatross that leads to stagnation. But the demonstrable effects of currency strength and weakness reveal the emptiness of their theory.

A country that attracts investment from abroad (through stable and fair governance, low taxes, a growing economy, and a productive labor force) and produces goods that are in demand on the global stage will generally see a rising currency. In essence, this is the reward for a job well done. Strong currencies then help nations stay strong by conferring greater purchasing power to its citizens and businesses, which keeps input costs low, thereby enhancing international competitiveness. Strong currencies also encourage savings, keep real interest rates low, lower capital costs, and allow for greater productivity and higher real wages.

It is often argued that a weak currency confers advantages in foreign trade. But the edge only results from putting exports on sale. Any merchant will tell you that it's easy to sell more if you cut prices, but most would prefer charging full retail. However, exports are not an end in themselves, they are a means to pay for imports. The goal of an economy is not to work, but to consume. If citizens in one nation buy goods produced in another, they must pay with exports. When a nation's currency appreciates imports cost less and fewer exports are needed to pay. This means goods and services at home will be cheaper and more plentiful, and citizens won't need to work as hard to buy them. This is the definition of rising living standards.

But when it comes to relative currency valuations, the United States dollar exists in a world of its own. As the international reserve, the dollar is the de-facto beneficiary of any other country's intervention. When countries intervene, they do so specifically against the dollar. In addition, many countries, (China and Taiwan for instance) maintain a pegged relationship to the Greenback. Therefore in a world dominated by interventionist banks, the factors that push the dollar have been inverted.  The dollar falls when fundamentals either improve abroad or deteriorate at home (both cases increase the propensity for intervention). The rest of the world's currencies compete on their own merit. As a result, it is not an accident that over the last decade Australia, New Zealand, and Switzerland, three of the world's strongest economies, have produced strong currencies.

Since 2001, all three have had generally appreciating currencies, accompanied by steadily rising exports, strong economic fundamentals, and low unemployment. From 2001 to 2012, the Kiwi Dollar appreciated by 98% against the U.S. dollar, but its exports in local currency terms increased by 40% (170% in U.S. dollar terms). Over the same time frame, the Aussie dollar appreciated by 103% and exports increased by 102% in local currency (and 305% in U.S. dollar terms). In Switzerland the story was the same, currency up 82%, exports up 53% in local terms and (and 175% in U.S. terms). Where exactly did they encounter export troubles due to their rising currencies?

At the same time, the strengthening currencies made few negative impacts on other aspects of economic performance. At the time when the Swiss bankers caved to international pressure in September 2011 and pegged its previously surging franc to the euro, their economy had shown some of the best economic performance on the Continent. More recently, Australia and New Zealand reported stunning job creation figures. Adjusted for population, the U.S. would have had to create more than 600,000 jobs per month to keep pace with Australia, and 900,000 jobs per month to match New Zealand (U.S. job creation has averaged about 169,000 per month over the last year).

These lessons have been wholly lost on the Japanese who are frantically trying (and succeeding) in severely devaluing the yen. Although Japan's export machine had not suffered from the yen's appreciation from 2001-2012 (up 30% in local currency exports and 98% in dollar terms), newly installed prime minister Shinzo Abe and his minions at the Bank of Japan believe a weaker yen is the key to renewed economic strength. But the collapse of the yen has helped push up both the Aussie and Kiwi dollars, which has spurred bankers in Australia and New Zealand into taking unneeded and ultimately self-destructive actions. In April they threw in their lot with the interventionists and cut interest rates to stop the rise of their currencies. But the moves fly in the face of the modern playbook which states that policy should be tightened during periods of full employment, strong growth, and surging real estate prices. The misplaced fear of a strong currency seems to trump all other concerns.

While there is little reason to believe that strong currencies stifle exports, there is ample evidence that they increase domestic purchasing power (which is a real test of economic success). In the United States, oil currently sells for about $97 per barrel, about 16% below the $113 high price seen in April 2011. And so while our economy falters, at least consumers are not saddled with surging energy costs. While the 20% devaluation of the yen since that high in 2011 has made Japan the champion of Keynesian economists, it also means that oil in Japan is currently selling for its highest price since the summer of 2008, just prior to the onset of the global financial crisis. And it's not just oil, the Japanese must pay more for everything they import. How this benefits the rank and file has yet to be properly explained.

The latest data confirms that the banzai attack on the yen has not helped Japan's trade position. The weaker currency led to higher import costs, resulting in the 10th month in a row of trade deficits. Although April exports rose 3.8 percent from a year earlier, the trade deficit widened to 879.9 billion yen ($8.6 billion), the worst April since at least 1979. But the falling yen is creating a clear and present danger in Japan's enormous bond market. In less than one month, yields on 10 year Japanese Government Bonds have more than doubled, approaching nearly 1%. While those rates may sound manageable for most countries, Japan has the highest debt to GDP ratio in the developed world. If they had to pay 2% (the same rate as its inflation target), the country would need to devote more than half of its tax revenue just to service its debt! Clearly this possibility is dawning on stock investors who pushed down the Nikkei by more 7% today.

Never in the course of history has a country's economy failed because its currency was too strong. It's a pathology that simply does not exist. On the other hand, the list of those ruined by weak currencies is extensive. The view that a weak currency is desirable is so absurd that it could only have been devised to serve the political agenda of those engineering the descent. And while I don't blame policy makers from spinning self-serving fairy tales (that is their nature), I find extreme fault with those hypnotized members of the media and the financial establishment who have checked their reason at the door.

A currency war is different from any other kind of conventional war in that the object is to kill oneself. The nation that succeeds in inflicting the most damage on its own citizens wins the war. The only real way to win is not to play.


To order your copy of Peter Schiff's latest book, The Real Crash: America’s Coming Bankruptcy – How to Save Yourself and Your Country, click here.

For in-depth analysis of this and other investment topics, subscribe to Peter Schiff's Global Investor newsletter. CLICK HERE for your free subscription.



Gene Arensburg Got Gold Report

“As just a hint of what the video contains, the positioning of large commercial traders in silver futures is at an extreme not seen in more than 13 years. It hints that the Big Hedgers have taken advantage of the price declines for gold and silver to get the heck out of their combined collective net short positioning – in a big way. ”

http://www.gotgoldreport.com/2013/05/courtesy-release-of-new-video-got-gold-report.html



Where is Your Money Safe?

Dear CIGAs, The answer is not here. Why would ZKB, owned by the Canton of Zurich, agree to this penalty? One anonymous but informed CIGA brings up this key point. The concern is will this set precedent for the other dozen or so Swiss banks under the eye of the IRS? The power of the... Read more »

The post Where is Your Money Safe? appeared first on Jim Sinclair's Mineset.



Test Post

This content is for Yearly Subscription, Monthly and Free 5 Day Trial members only. Visit the site and log in/register to read.


The Beginning Move Of The Gold End Game

Dear CIGAs, Gold and Silver exchanges are going to be forced to become cash spot contract physical exchanges. Is this a market mistake, or a massive physical gold project of those who now own all the gold? It is a project in my opinion that the knuckle draggers at the Comex are yet to figure... Read more »

The post The Beginning Move Of The Gold End Game appeared first on Jim Sinclair's Mineset.



Jim’s Mailbox

Jim Sinclair’s Commentary If this proves to be true then gold banks have done us all a great favor because the only asset out there that will be a storehouse of value is gold. Gold in Singapore is looking better every day. Hi Jim, It looks like Switzerland has discretely introduced the concept of "Bail-in"... Read more »

The post Jim’s Mailbox appeared first on Jim Sinclair's Mineset.



Missed this yesterday

Hilsenrath Hits The Tape: Ignore Everything I Said Two Weeks Ago
Tyler Durden’s pictureSubmitted by Tyler Durden on 05/22/2013 12:00 -0400

The last time the WSJ’ Jon Hilsenrath was relevant was two weeks ago (in a flashback to those days before QEternity when infinite QE was not assured and Jon’s input was actually relevant), when following an article of his, and due to his “proximity” with the New York Fed, many assumed that the Tapering suggested by Hilsenrath was being telegraphed by Bernanke to the market. Turns out it was nothing but yet another baffle with bullshit headfake by a central planning regime that is now merely engaged in observing market responses to indirect stimuli: if reduce monthly flow by $20 billion then X (-1%); if cut QE off entirely then Y (-50%?), and so on. Moments ago the same Hilsenrath just released another piece, which effectively refuted everything his previous piece suggested, and in fact made his position as Fed mouthpiece absolutely irrelevant, courtesy of the following disclosure: “this time, when the Fed shuts off bond buying, it won’t be… predictable.” He goes so far as to say that the term “tapering” is no longer even applicable! Funny that, considering on May 11, none other than Hilsenrath said: “Federal Reserve officials have mapped out a strategy for winding down an unprecedented $85 billion-a-month bond-buying program meant to spur the economy.”

The irony here is that Hilsenrath is correct, but for another far simpler reason: the Fed simply can not shut down bond buying, at least not voluntarily, without crashing bond the stock market, and the perception that the economy is doing well (it isn’t), just because the S&P hits new all time highs day after day.

The Fed will of course “shut down” bond buying when like in the summer of 2008 simple inflation is raging in commodities, and when a bank has to be sacrificed to induce a deflationary vortex. However, for now thanks to the epic planning in keeping the Brent vigilantes largely in check (now that the Bond vigilatnes are long dead), and since the market has a few more thousand points higher to go before everyone has no choice but to acknowledge how ridiculous the asset bubble has become, there is, to paraphrase Tim Geithner, “no risk.”

From the WSJ:

When the Fed ended a buying program in 2011, it shut it off all at once. When it shut off another bond buying program in 2009 and 2010, it did it in predetermined, predictable and “tapered” steps. When the Fed raised short-term interest rates from 2003 to 2006, it raised them in gradual and very predictable steps.

This time, when the Fed shuts off bond buying, it won’t be abrupt and it won’t be predictable. The term “tapering” — which implies a predictable gradual process — probably doesn’t describe the plan very well any more, and you’re unlikely to hear Fed officials describing it like that. Instead, the Fed will take a step and then see what happens. Officials also want to avoid the market blowup that happened in 1994, when it took one step and the market assumed that meant a succession of additional steps.

“A step to reduce the flow of purchases would not be an automatic, mechanistic process to end the program,” Mr. Bernanke said. In other words, if the Fed takes a step to reduce the program and the economy falters, it could sit still for a while or even dial purchases back up.

The Fed effectively wants the markets to experience the same uncertainty it experiences about policy and the economy when officials walk into a meeting, and it wants to condition the market to avoid jumping to conclusions about what it will do next. As officials keep saying, it will depend on the economy.

Perhaps the biggest insult here to sentient creatures everywhere, is that people have now become merely lab rats in the greatest behavioral conditioning experiment of all time, not only as regards to buying stocks on both bad and good news, or any utterance out of Bernanke’s mouth, but an experiment designed to force everyone to simply stop thinking logically – the logic being that since every central bank is engaged full bore in reflating everything, than the economy left on its own is simply horrendous – and BTFD.



Attention Chartologists

This content is for Yearly Subscription, Monthly and Free 5 Day Trial members only. Visit the site and log in/register to read.


USD/JPY

is that smoke I smell coming from Japan?

Japan gyrations underline economy’s vulnerability

By ELAINE KURTENBACH
AP Business Writer

(AP:TOKYO) Japan’s financial markets gyrated wildly Thursday, underscoring the vulnerability of its economy to a loss of investor confidence as Prime Minister Shinzo Abe attempts shock monetary easing to end two decades of stagnation.

Interest rates, or yields, on 10-year Japanese government bonds briefly topped 1 percent for the first time in a year on Thursday, following news that some U.S. Federal Reserve officials are willing to scale back the American central bank’s stimulus efforts as soon as June if the economy perks up.

Thursday’s spike, which came despite the Bank of Japan’s aggressive efforts to keep borrowing costs down, is unnerving some investors at a time when Japan’s already overburdened government finances are vulnerable to rises in interest rates. A sustained rise would push up the cost of borrowing for the government.

“Japan really has a long-term debt problem,” said Franklin Allen, a professor at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. “There will be a financial stability problem” if long-term government bond yields rise to 2.5 percent to 3 percent, he said.

The bond gyrations, along with fresh data showing China’s recovery is faltering, led to a 7.3 percent tumble in the benchmark Nikkei 225 stock index, as investors cashed in on recent sharp gains. The Nikkei lost 1,143 to 14,483.98, its worst drop since the March 2011 tsunami disaster.

The Bank of Japan has been grappling with unexpected swings in the government bond market since early April, when its new governor, Haruhiko Kuroda, announced a drastic shift in policy aimed at doubling the amount of cash circulating in Japan’s economy. That move should in theory stop yields from rising. The central bank’s goal is to attain a 2 percent inflation target within two years, the main tenet of Abe’s economic program, dubbed “Abenomics.”

“We’ve never seen this volatility … that we’re seeing today in the Japanese market,” said Ken Courtis, a former Goldman Sachs vice chairman and investment banker.

Since taking office in December, Abe has also raised government spending and promised reforms to make the world’s No. 3 economy more competitive. Like the Fed, the Bank of Japan is buying massive amounts of government bonds, seeking to keep interest rates low to encourage people and businesses to borrow and spend more.

The government has yet to achieve its aim of breaking out of a deflationary rut of sagging prices that has slowed investment and is thought to be discouraging consumers from spending. Since rising prices would mean money spent now will go further than later, the government hopes to get Japanese to step up spending, especially for big ticket items like cars and houses.

The effort to “reflate” the economy has pushed share prices sharply higher, while the value of Japan’s currency has fallen by 25 percent against the U.S. dollar since late last year. The yen was trading at about 101.8 to the dollar on Thursday after briefly passing 103 to the dollar.

Some say the success in boosting stock prices and weakening the yen could sap momentum for difficult economic reforms that are crucial to the success of Abenomics. Abe also wants to carry out political reforms such as changing Japan’s constitution which enshrines pacifism.

“The incentive to carry out structural reforms is weakening. There might be a sense that nothing more has to be done,” said Shinichi Ichikawa, chief market strategist at Credit Suisse in Tokyo.

“It requires a lot of strength for the prime minister to change the constitution. And of course a lot of power is needed to start the structural reform of the economy. I don’t believe that one prime minister can achieve both at the same time.”

Whether Abenomics succeeds or fails, Japan’s government must ultimately reckon with its years of deficit spending and mountainous debt.

If the central bank revives inflation, it eventually will have to raise interest rates to keep price rises in check. Government debt amounts to over twice the size of the economy and higher rates would vastly increase the government’s repayment burden as it continually sells new bonds to finance its deficits.

Paying interest on the government debt already consumes a quarter of government spending, said Courtis.

“What will Japan do,” he said, “when interest rates go up and debt servicing starts to swallow the entire budget?”

The level of Japan’s debt is higher, relative to its economy, than even some of the crisis-stricken European countries. But because it is mostly owned by domestic investors, especially huge banks and insurance companies, the country’s credit rating has remained steady.

But many Japanese financial institutions, especially regional banks and credit cooperatives, would be unable to keep such large holdings of government bonds if the value of those bonds drops too far, Allen said. Individual buyers are likewise seeing their retirement savings evaporate.

The BOJ has pledged to help quell the turbulence in the market. On Thursday, it added an extra 2 trillion yen in liquidity, seeking to counter the jump in bond yields. But the volatility raises questions over how much influence the BOJ wields over the market, despite soaking up about 70 percent of all new bond issuance.

Japan’s economy expanded at a faster-than-expected annual pace of 3.5 percent in the last quarter, a development many supporters view as a vindication of Abe’s approach. The Bank of Japan ended a two-day policy meeting on Tuesday with no change in policy, saying the economy was “picking up,” despite the lack of any change in price trends so far.

Critics contend that keeping interest rates artificially low to encourage borrowing merely encourages companies to waste money and avoid improving their efficiency and competitiveness.

Abe’s government needs to produce a convincing program for the reforms needed to sustain growth, and to coax business into raising wages and investment, or face further punishment from investors, said Courtis.

“When people see the economics could be very problematic, in effect, if there’s no big structural long-term release of domestic demand, all this really amounts to is a big devaluation,” he said. “That’s the monetary equivalent of a Pearl Harbor.”